I have been hearing from a few folks out my way that ski poles for skating are on average getting a bit longer. The explanation is that with more and more skiers using the V2 technique, that it makes sense to go up in length so that one can get more torque with the poles. I am not able to explain very clearly, but thought you might have an opinion on this subject. I am thinking I would get a greater glide if my poles were longer. Your thoughts please... I am 6'tall and use 170's and they come up to just about the bottom of my nose.
Yes, poles on average have been getting longer due to a couple of reasons. 1. Skiing has gotten faster due to improvements in technique, equipment, and wax. The faster average speed you ski, the longer the pole will be. 2. Skiers have recently emphasized strength much more than in the past. Stronger skiers = longer poles. 3. For the highest speeds (sprint races) they use longer poles. Sprinting has impacted distance skiing in many aspects, poles included. Personally, I don't think having skate poles with a height past your nose is necessary. Somewhere in between the chin and nose is good. Classic poles should fit uncomfortably under the armpits. Longer poles can add speed but shorter poles help ensure proper technique (an overlooked advantage on hilly distance courses). In the end, it comes down to personal preference. Go with what feels right!
Gus Keading CXC Team
Tom this is the Elite athletes answer. For us Master skiers who do not hit the weight room nor get up on our toes and have an overall slower turnover and more docile technique the old rules still apply your height in inches less 20cm for skate and less 30 for classic is the target to consider. Andy at SkiPost
No comments:
Post a Comment